did anyone see (even accidentally) that episode of Sabrina the Teenage Witch? mitosis is...
she was trying to study biology with her boyfriend Harvey (bad idea as Harvey had early 90s white-boy hair). every try would begin with "mitosis is..." before it would be cut off by a timely interruption that rendered them both ill equiped for the test the next day after a series of supernatural antics.
so far it is an accurate description of astrophysics for me - alas/thankfully sans boyfriend Harvey with 90s white-boy hair (or even MJH for that matter). there is a new professor teaching this year. though he does not go into super complicated mathematics as the last one did (while we were ill equipped to even deal with multivariable derivatives) this one simply glosses over them and refers you to the compact green textbook. and compact physics books always means one thing: only smart people can read this.
and what physics does best is tell you that contrary to whatever you thought before, you are NOT smart. not smart like Newton, not smart like Lenz, or Weinz, or Hertz, or Chandrasekhar, or Runge, or Eddington, or Brahe, or Keppler, or Hook. it's a small recompense that Hook's Law has been redubbed as "Hooker's Law" by Sucre in the latest episode of Prison Break as he tried to reiterate to Aruzzi what Michael explained earlier about tensile strength and wall elasticity. memories of Home Improvement are recalled.
it has become clearly apparent that my left-hemisphere has reached its limit. right-side is now getting the workout of its life making up new ways to slide physics principles and suppositions into essays about the metaphorical use of red riding hoods. my recently developed skill for reading 3 different novels at the 'same time' is also being put to good use as multiple english classes require multiple novel readings. speaking of which, "stone angel" is more boring than watching a boulder acquire a coat of moss.
now if that boulder were in space, created by the accretion of a protostellar disk, then it would not collect moss ever. even then, i would rather watch that boulder than re-read stone angel. i liken it to reading the first page of Pride and Prejudice. no offense, but female narrative is rather long-winded.
11.10.05
astrophysics is...
3.10.05
october
copious english readings + astrophysics assignments + essays + tests + hockey's return + tv + msn = 1 bad month if my priorities remain in the latter half.
1.10.05
genesis
don't you just hate it when you're sitting in a Bible in Literature lecture on Genesis 1-4 and some putz zeroes in on the "Adam was first" thing?
"oh, it says here that Adam was created first and that Eve was made from his rib." (Gen 2:21-22)
this got the feminists in the crowd astir (because men didn't let them vote and made them wear underwear).
as annoying as it is, we've been through this before. Augustine pondered about the transmission of original sin through progenesis, as jotted down in his "Confessions", and they were later misinterpreted by withered, old monks who thought he was talking about sex in general, thus blaming all womankind for being so nubile and tempting - just as Adam first blamed Eve in Gen 3:12.
so generations of patriarchy and misogyny built up tremendous pressure in vertebrate females. that bra-burning backlash now ripples through our societal consciousness as sensual media (the main culprit being beer commercials and anyone influenced by esther nee madonna). women seeking empowerment in these climes seem to believe that their power comes either from a) their careers; b) their bodies; or c) their careers exploiting their bodies.
anyways, here's some causal reading for you: Genesis 2: 18-20
18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."so my professor thinks that God wanted to make Adam a helper from the animals. and by helper he meant partner. and by partner he meant mate. bwahahaha.
19 Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found.